<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Politicklish™ &#187; Budget</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.politicklish.com/category/domestic-policy/economy/budget-economy-domestic-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.politicklish.com</link>
	<description>God, Liberty, and The Constitution - These Are The General Welfare and The Common Good</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A Reckless Congress &#8211; WSJ.com</title>
		<link>http://www.politicklish.com/2009/07/17/a-reckless-congress-wsjcom-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.politicklish.com/2009/07/17/a-reckless-congress-wsjcom-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tickler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fruits of Liberal Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare (lack thereof)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spending Bill (Non-stimulus)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicklish.com/?p=493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The level of anger should be rising. These clowns need to be out before this goes through. Call your senators. Say this about the 1,018-page health-care bill that House Democrats unveiled this week and that President Obama heartily endorsed: It finally reveals at least some of the price of the reckless ambitions of our current government. With huge majorities and a President in a rush to outrun the declining popularity of his agenda, Democrats are bidding to impose an unrepealable European-style welfare state in a matter of weeks. via A Reckless Congress &#8211; WSJ.com.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The level of anger should be rising. These clowns need to be out before this goes through. Call your senators.</p>
<blockquote><p>Say this about the 1,018-page health-care bill that House Democrats unveiled this week and that President Obama heartily endorsed: It finally reveals at least some of the price of the reckless ambitions of our current government. With huge majorities and a President in a rush to outrun the declining popularity of his agenda, Democrats are bidding to impose an unrepealable European-style welfare state in a matter of weeks.</p>
<p>via <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124779717982855785.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/online.wsj.com/article/SB124779717982855785.html?referer=');">A Reckless Congress &#8211; WSJ.com</a>.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politicklish.com/2009/07/17/a-reckless-congress-wsjcom-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Reckless Congress &#8211; WSJ.com</title>
		<link>http://www.politicklish.com/2009/07/17/a-reckless-congress-wsjcom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.politicklish.com/2009/07/17/a-reckless-congress-wsjcom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ticklers Wife</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment (or Un)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneurship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fruits of Liberal Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government's Role]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare (lack thereof)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Welfare & Poverty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entitlement program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US budget deficit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicklish.com/?p=491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr. Obama&#8217;s February budget provided the outline, but the House bill now fills in the details. To wit, tax increases that would take U.S. rates higher even than most of Europe. Yet even those increases aren&#8217;t nearly enough to finance the $1 trillion in new spending, which itself is surely a low-ball estimate. Meanwhile, the bill would create a new government health entitlement that will kill private insurance and lead to a government-run system. via A Reckless Congress &#8211; WSJ.com.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Obama&#8217;s February budget provided the outline, but the House bill now fills in the details. To wit, tax increases that would take U.S. rates higher even than most of Europe. Yet even those increases aren&#8217;t nearly enough to finance the $1 trillion in new spending, which itself is surely a low-ball estimate. Meanwhile, the bill would create a new government health entitlement that will kill private insurance and lead to a government-run system.</p>
<p>via <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124779717982855785.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/online.wsj.com/article/SB124779717982855785.html?referer=');">A Reckless Congress &#8211; WSJ.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politicklish.com/2009/07/17/a-reckless-congress-wsjcom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Director’s Blog » Blog Archive » The Long-Term Budget Outlook</title>
		<link>http://www.politicklish.com/2009/07/16/director%e2%80%99s-blog-%c2%bb-blog-archive-%c2%bb-the-long-term-budget-outlook/</link>
		<comments>http://www.politicklish.com/2009/07/16/director%e2%80%99s-blog-%c2%bb-blog-archive-%c2%bb-the-long-term-budget-outlook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 00:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tickler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bureaucrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare (lack thereof)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congressional budget office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicklish.com/?p=489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Under current law, the federal budget is on an unsustainable path, because federal debt will continue to grow much faster than the economy over the long run. Although great uncertainty surrounds long-term fiscal projections, rising costs for health care and the aging of the population will cause federal spending to increase rapidly under any plausible scenario for current law. Unless revenues increase just as rapidly, the rise in spending will produce growing budget deficits. Large budget deficits would reduce national saving, leading to more borrowing from abroad and less domestic investment, which in turn would depress economic growth in the United States. Over time, accumulating debt would cause substantial harm to the economy. The following chart shows our projection of federal debt relative to GDP under the two scenarios we modeled. via Director’s Blog » Blog Archive » The Long-Term Budget Outlook.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Under current law, the federal budget is on an unsustainable path, because federal debt will continue to grow much faster than the economy over the long run. Although great uncertainty surrounds long-term fiscal projections, rising costs for health care and the aging of the population will cause federal spending to increase rapidly under any plausible scenario for current law. Unless revenues increase just as rapidly, the rise in spending will produce growing budget deficits. Large budget deficits would reduce national saving, leading to more borrowing from abroad and less domestic investment, which in turn would depress economic growth in the United States. Over time, accumulating debt would cause substantial harm to the economy. The following chart shows our projection of federal debt relative to GDP under the two scenarios we modeled.</p>
<p>via <a href="http://cboblog.cbo.gov/?p=328" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/cboblog.cbo.gov/?p=328&amp;referer=');">Director’s Blog » Blog Archive » The Long-Term Budget Outlook</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politicklish.com/2009/07/16/director%e2%80%99s-blog-%c2%bb-blog-archive-%c2%bb-the-long-term-budget-outlook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

