<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Politicklish™ &#187; Welfare &amp; Poverty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.politicklish.com/category/domestic-policy/welfare-poverty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.politicklish.com</link>
	<description>God, Liberty, and The Constitution - These Are The General Welfare and The Common Good</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Former Shirley Sherrod employee accuses her of exploiting black farm laborers &#124; Washington Examiner</title>
		<link>http://www.politicklish.com/2010/08/03/former-shirley-sherrod-employee-accuses-her-of-exploiting-black-farm-laborers-washington-examiner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.politicklish.com/2010/08/03/former-shirley-sherrod-employee-accuses-her-of-exploiting-black-farm-laborers-washington-examiner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 03:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ticklers Wife</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Welfare & Poverty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicklish.com/?p=1207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It now seems that Mr. and Mrs. Sherrod inflicted quite a bit of pain and suffering on their own &#8212; and on some of the very people Mr. Sherrod described as &#8220;our own&#8221; in a speech earlier this year &#8212; at New Communities, Inc. (NCI). The group is described at the Rural Development Leadership Network&#8217;s web site as &#8220;the land trust that Shirley and Charles Sherrod established, with other black farm families in the 1960s.&#8221; via Former Shirley Sherrod employee accuses her of exploiting black farm laborers &#124; Washington Examiner.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It now seems that Mr. and Mrs. Sherrod inflicted quite a bit of pain and suffering on their own &#8212; and on some of the very people Mr. Sherrod described as &#8220;our own&#8221; in a speech earlier this year &#8212; at New Communities, Inc. (NCI). The group is described at the Rural Development Leadership Network&#8217;s web site as &#8220;the land trust that Shirley and Charles Sherrod established, with other black farm families in the 1960s.&#8221;</p>
<p>via <a href="http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/Examiner-Opinion-Zone/Former-Shirley-Sherrod-nci-employee-accuses-her-of-exploiting-black-farm-laborers-99880014.html#ixzz0va154iwo" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/Examiner-Opinion-Zone/Former-Shirley-Sherrod-nci-employee-accuses-her-of-exploiting-black-farm-laborers-99880014.html_ixzz0va154iwo?referer=');">Former Shirley Sherrod employee accuses her of exploiting black farm laborers | Washington Examiner</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politicklish.com/2010/08/03/former-shirley-sherrod-employee-accuses-her-of-exploiting-black-farm-laborers-washington-examiner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama’s New ‘Poverty’ Measurement &#8211; Robert Rector &#8211; National Review Online</title>
		<link>http://www.politicklish.com/2010/03/10/obama%e2%80%99s-new-%e2%80%98poverty%e2%80%99-measurement-robert-rector-national-review-online/</link>
		<comments>http://www.politicklish.com/2010/03/10/obama%e2%80%99s-new-%e2%80%98poverty%e2%80%99-measurement-robert-rector-national-review-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ticklers Wife</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Welfare & Poverty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicklish.com/?p=957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The current poverty measure counts absolute purchasing power — how much steak and potatoes you can buy. The new measure will count comparative purchasing power — how much steak and potatoes you can buy relative to other people. As the nation becomes wealthier, the poverty standards will increase in proportion. In other words, Obama will employ a statistical trick to ensure that “the poor will always be with you,” no matter how much better off they get in absolute terms. via Obama’s New ‘Poverty’ Measurement &#8211; Robert Rector &#8211; National Review Online.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The current poverty measure counts absolute purchasing power — how much steak and potatoes you can buy. The new measure will count comparative purchasing power — how much steak and potatoes you can buy relative to other people. As the nation becomes wealthier, the poverty standards will increase in proportion. In other words, Obama will employ a statistical trick to ensure that “the poor will always be with you,” no matter how much better off they get in absolute terms.</p>
<p>via <a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/427180/obamas-new-poverty-measurement/robert-rector?page=1" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/article.nationalreview.com/427180/obamas-new-poverty-measurement/robert-rector?page=1&amp;referer=');">Obama’s New ‘Poverty’ Measurement &#8211; Robert Rector &#8211; National Review Online</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politicklish.com/2010/03/10/obama%e2%80%99s-new-%e2%80%98poverty%e2%80%99-measurement-robert-rector-national-review-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Westchester Agrees to Desegregate Housing in Mostly White Towns &#8211; NYTimes.com</title>
		<link>http://www.politicklish.com/2009/09/11/westchester-agrees-to-desegregate-housing-in-mostly-white-towns-nytimescom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.politicklish.com/2009/09/11/westchester-agrees-to-desegregate-housing-in-mostly-white-towns-nytimescom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tickler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affirmative Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fruits of Liberal Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NY Left]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Welfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Welfare & Poverty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desegregate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moderate-income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[westchester]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicklish.com/?p=578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This evil, no different than housing projects on prime real estate other places, drives bigger divides and causes more racial resentment than nearly any other policy. Total lack of understanding how people think and feel. Westchester County entered into a landmark desegregation agreement on Monday that would compel it to create hundreds of houses and apartments for moderate-income people in overwhelmingly white communities and aggressively market them to nonwhites in Westchester and New York City. The agreement, if ratified by the county’s Board of Legislators, would settle a lawsuit filed by an antidiscrimination group and could become a template for increased scrutiny of local governments’ housing policies by the Obama administration. “This is consistent with the president’s desire to see a fully integrated society,” said Ron Sims, the deputy secretary of housing and urban development, which helped broker the settlement along with the Justice Department. “Until now, we tended to lay dormant. This is historic, because we are going to hold people’s feet to the fire.” Westchester Agrees to Desegregate Housing in Mostly White Towns &#8211; NYTimes.com.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This evil, no different than housing projects on prime real estate other places, drives bigger divides and causes more racial resentment than nearly any other policy. Total lack of understanding how people think and feel.</p>
<blockquote><p>Westchester County entered into a landmark desegregation agreement on Monday that would compel it to create hundreds of houses and apartments for moderate-income people in overwhelmingly white communities and aggressively market them to nonwhites in Westchester and New York City.</p>
<p>The agreement, if ratified by the county’s Board of Legislators, would settle a lawsuit filed by an antidiscrimination group and could become a template for increased scrutiny of local governments’ housing policies by the Obama administration.</p>
<p>“This is consistent with the president’s desire to see a fully integrated society,” said Ron Sims, the deputy secretary of housing and urban development, which helped broker the settlement along with the Justice Department. “Until now, we tended to lay dormant. This is historic, because we are going to hold people’s feet to the fire.”</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/11/nyregion/11settle.html?_r=3&amp;pagewanted=1&amp;sq=westchester&amp;st=cse&amp;scp=1" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.nytimes.com/2009/08/11/nyregion/11settle.html?_r=3_amp_pagewanted=1_amp_sq=westchester_amp_st=cse_amp_scp=1&amp;referer=');">Westchester Agrees to Desegregate Housing in Mostly White Towns &#8211; NYTimes.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politicklish.com/2009/09/11/westchester-agrees-to-desegregate-housing-in-mostly-white-towns-nytimescom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Mackey: The Whole Foods Alternative to ObamaCare &#8211; WSJ.com</title>
		<link>http://www.politicklish.com/2009/08/12/john-mackey-the-whole-foods-alternative-to-obamacare-wsjcom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.politicklish.com/2009/08/12/john-mackey-the-whole-foods-alternative-to-obamacare-wsjcom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ticklers Wife</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fruits of Liberal Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government's Role]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare (lack thereof)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Welfare & Poverty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nationalized healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socialized healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whole foods]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicklish.com/?p=556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While we clearly need health-care reform, the last thing our country needs is a massive new health-care entitlement that will create hundreds of billions of dollars of new unfunded deficits and move us much closer to a government takeover of our health-care system. Instead, we should be trying to achieve reforms by moving in the opposite direction—toward less government control and more individual empowerment. Here are eight reforms that would greatly lower the cost of health care for everyone: Read the whole article here&#8230;  John Mackey: The Whole Foods Alternative to ObamaCare &#8211; WSJ.com.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While we clearly need health-care reform, the last thing our country needs is a massive new health-care entitlement that will create hundreds of billions of dollars of new unfunded deficits and move us much closer to a government takeover of our health-care system. Instead, we should be trying to achieve reforms by moving in the opposite direction—toward less government control and more individual empowerment. Here are eight reforms that would greatly lower the cost of health care for everyone:</p>
<p>Read the whole article here&#8230;  <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204251404574342170072865070.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204251404574342170072865070.html?referer=');">John Mackey: The Whole Foods Alternative to ObamaCare &#8211; WSJ.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politicklish.com/2009/08/12/john-mackey-the-whole-foods-alternative-to-obamacare-wsjcom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s own words, wants private healthcare gone!</title>
		<link>http://www.politicklish.com/2009/08/04/obamas-own-words-wants-private-healthcare-gone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.politicklish.com/2009/08/04/obamas-own-words-wants-private-healthcare-gone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ticklers Wife</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fruits of Liberal Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government's Role]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare (lack thereof)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Welfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Welfare & Poverty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obamacare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicklish.com/?p=547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/p-bY92mcOdk&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/p-bY92mcOdk&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politicklish.com/2009/08/04/obamas-own-words-wants-private-healthcare-gone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Urine Test for Welfare Recipients &#8211; There Oughtta Be a Law</title>
		<link>http://www.politicklish.com/2009/07/23/urine-test-for-welfare-recipients-there-oughtta-be-a-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.politicklish.com/2009/07/23/urine-test-for-welfare-recipients-there-oughtta-be-a-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 01:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tickler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment (or Un)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fruits of Liberal Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Welfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Welfare & Poverty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicklish.com/?p=511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a good common sense email going around&#8230; THE JOB &#8211; URINE TEST Like a lot of folks in this state, I have a job. I work, they pay  me.. I pay my taxes and the government distributes my taxes as it sees fit. In order to get that paycheck, I am required to pass a random urine test with which I have no problem. What I do have a problem with is the distribution of my taxes to people who don&#8217;t have to pass a urine test. So here is my Question.  Shouldn&#8217;t one have to pass a urine test to get a welfare check because I have to pass one to earn it for them? Understand, I have no problem with helping people get back on their feet. I do, on the other hand, have a problem with helping someone sitting on their rump&#8211;doing drugs, while I work. . . . Can you imagine how much money the state would save if people had to pass a urine test to get a public assistance check? We could title that program, &#8216;Urine or You&#8217;re Out&#8217;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="word-spacing: 0px; font-family: 'Comic Sans MS'; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: medium; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; text-transform: none; color: #000000; text-indent: 0px; white-space: normal; letter-spacing: normal; border-collapse: separate;"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman',helvetica;">Here&#8217;s a good common sense email going around&#8230;</span></span></p>
<blockquote><p><strong><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman',helvetica;">THE JOB &#8211; URINE TEST</span></strong></p>
<div><span style="font-family: arial,helvetica;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Like a lot of folks in this state, I have a job. I work, they pay  me.. I pay my taxes and the government distributes my taxes as it sees fit. In order to get that paycheck, I am required to pass a random urine test with which I have no problem. What I do have a problem with is the distribution of my taxes to people who don&#8217;t have to pass a urine test. </span></span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman',helvetica;"><br />
</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: arial,helvetica;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">So here is my Question.  Shouldn&#8217;t one have to pass a urine test to get a welfare check because I have to pass one to earn it for them? </span></span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman',helvetica;"><br />
</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: arial,helvetica;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Understand, I have no problem with helping people get back on their feet. I do, on the other hand, have a problem with helping someone sitting on their rump&#8211;doing drugs, while I work. . . . Can you imagine how much money the state would save if people had to pass a urine test to get a public assistance check?</span></span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman',helvetica;"><br />
</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman',helvetica;">We could title that program, &#8216;Urine or You&#8217;re Out&#8217;.</span></div>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politicklish.com/2009/07/23/urine-test-for-welfare-recipients-there-oughtta-be-a-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Reckless Congress &#8211; WSJ.com</title>
		<link>http://www.politicklish.com/2009/07/17/a-reckless-congress-wsjcom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.politicklish.com/2009/07/17/a-reckless-congress-wsjcom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ticklers Wife</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment (or Un)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneurship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fruits of Liberal Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government's Role]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare (lack thereof)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Welfare & Poverty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entitlement program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US budget deficit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicklish.com/?p=491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr. Obama&#8217;s February budget provided the outline, but the House bill now fills in the details. To wit, tax increases that would take U.S. rates higher even than most of Europe. Yet even those increases aren&#8217;t nearly enough to finance the $1 trillion in new spending, which itself is surely a low-ball estimate. Meanwhile, the bill would create a new government health entitlement that will kill private insurance and lead to a government-run system. via A Reckless Congress &#8211; WSJ.com.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Obama&#8217;s February budget provided the outline, but the House bill now fills in the details. To wit, tax increases that would take U.S. rates higher even than most of Europe. Yet even those increases aren&#8217;t nearly enough to finance the $1 trillion in new spending, which itself is surely a low-ball estimate. Meanwhile, the bill would create a new government health entitlement that will kill private insurance and lead to a government-run system.</p>
<p>via <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124779717982855785.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/online.wsj.com/article/SB124779717982855785.html?referer=');">A Reckless Congress &#8211; WSJ.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politicklish.com/2009/07/17/a-reckless-congress-wsjcom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Black-White Gap in Jobless Rate Widens in New York City &#8211; NYTimes.com</title>
		<link>http://www.politicklish.com/2009/07/13/black-white-gap-in-jobless-rate-widens-in-new-york-city-nytimescom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.politicklish.com/2009/07/13/black-white-gap-in-jobless-rate-widens-in-new-york-city-nytimescom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tickler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrat Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fruits of Liberal Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Welfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Welfare & Poverty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicklish.com/?p=447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Economists said they were not certain why so many more blacks were losing their jobs in New York, especially when a large share of the layoffs in the city have been in fields where they are not well represented, like finance and professional services. But in those sectors, the economists suggested that blacks may have had less seniority when layoffs occurred. And black workers hold an outsize share of the jobs in retailing and other service industries that have been shrinking as consumers curtail their spending. via Black-White Gap in Jobless Rate Widens in New York City &#8211; NYTimes.com. Some simple math for Barry Little League, hurt the employers and buyers and you&#8217;ll always end up hurt the only citizens you care about, your voting handouts. Low taxes for all is the only way, but leave alone learning in time, you&#8217;ll just never learn. 3.5 years to go before we can get some basic IQ back in office.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Economists said they were not certain why so many more blacks were losing their jobs in New York, especially when a large share of the layoffs in the city have been in fields where they are not well represented, like finance and professional services. But in those sectors, the economists suggested that blacks may have had less seniority when layoffs occurred. And black workers hold an outsize share of the jobs in retailing and other service industries that have been shrinking as consumers curtail their spending.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>via <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/13/nyregion/13unemployment.html?_r=3" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.nytimes.com/2009/07/13/nyregion/13unemployment.html?_r=3&amp;referer=');">Black-White Gap in Jobless Rate Widens in New York City &#8211; NYTimes.com</a>.</p></blockquote>
<p>Some simple math for Barry Little League, hurt the employers and buyers and you&#8217;ll always end up hurt the only citizens you care about, your voting handouts.</p>
<p>Low taxes for all is the only way, but leave alone learning in time, you&#8217;ll just never learn. 3.5 years to go before we can get some basic IQ back in office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politicklish.com/2009/07/13/black-white-gap-in-jobless-rate-widens-in-new-york-city-nytimescom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>YouTube &#8211; How The Democrats Caused The Financial Crisis: Starring Bill Clinton&#8217;s HUD Secretary Andrew Cuomo And Barack Obama; With Special Guest Appearances By Bill Clinton And Jimmy Carter</title>
		<link>http://www.politicklish.com/2009/07/11/youtube-how-the-democrats-caused-the-financial-crisis-starring-bill-clintons-hud-secretary-andrew-cuomo-and-barack-obama-with-special-guest-appearances-by-bill-clinton-and-jimmy-carter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.politicklish.com/2009/07/11/youtube-how-the-democrats-caused-the-financial-crisis-starring-bill-clintons-hud-secretary-andrew-cuomo-and-barack-obama-with-special-guest-appearances-by-bill-clinton-and-jimmy-carter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 12:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tickler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Meltdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fruits of Liberal Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Welfare & Poverty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicklish.com/?p=443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[YouTube &#8211; How The Democrats Caused The Financial Crisis: Starring Bill Clinton&#8217;s HUD Secretary Andrew Cuomo And Barack Obama; With Special Guest Appearances By Bill Clinton And Jimmy Carter.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lr1M1T2Y314&amp;feature=related" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lr1M1T2Y314_amp_feature=related&amp;referer=');">YouTube &#8211; How The Democrats Caused The Financial Crisis: Starring Bill Clinton&#8217;s HUD Secretary Andrew Cuomo And Barack Obama; With Special Guest Appearances By Bill Clinton And Jimmy Carter</a>.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="350" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/Lr1M1T2Y314&amp;feature=related" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Lr1M1T2Y314&amp;feature=related" /></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politicklish.com/2009/07/11/youtube-how-the-democrats-caused-the-financial-crisis-starring-bill-clintons-hud-secretary-andrew-cuomo-and-barack-obama-with-special-guest-appearances-by-bill-clinton-and-jimmy-carter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>YouTube &#8211; Rep. John Fleming Health Care Resolution</title>
		<link>http://www.politicklish.com/2009/07/09/youtube-rep-john-fleming-health-care-resolution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.politicklish.com/2009/07/09/youtube-rep-john-fleming-health-care-resolution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tickler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrat Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fruits of Liberal Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government's Role]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare (lack thereof)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Welfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Welfare & Poverty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fleming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obamacare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicklish.com/?p=439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[YouTube &#8211; Rep. John Fleming Health Care Resolution.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrwS_FOFjpA" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrwS_FOFjpA&amp;referer=');">YouTube &#8211; Rep. John Fleming Health Care Resolution</a>.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="350" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/wrwS_FOFjpA" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/wrwS_FOFjpA" /></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politicklish.com/2009/07/09/youtube-rep-john-fleming-health-care-resolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

