There’s no question that this judge was definitely not the one to try this case. Prop 8 defenders trusted that he could put aside his lifestyle choice and rule fairly, but this clearly wasn’t the case from the tone and much-protesting of his novel ruling.
In a press release yesterday, AFA identifies Walker as a “practicing homosexual” who, for that reason, should have recused himself from this case “because his judgment is clearly compromised by his own sexual proclivity.” Fischer concurs.
“It’s really no different in our judgment than having a judge who owns a porn studio being asked to issue a ruling on an anti-pornography statute,” says the AFA spokesman. “There’s a conflict of interest there.”
via Judge’s ‘sexual proclivity’ compromised ruling (OneNewsNow.com).